Fallout: New Vegas director Josh Sawyer says Obsidian took a different approach to level scaling than Bethesda did with Fallout 3 to teach players that “things work a little differently” here, and that “you’re going to get your ass handed to you if you’re not careful.”
Speaking to The 41st Precinct in a video interview you can check out below, Sawyer talks about going back to the OG Fallout when designing a new spin of his own on the post-apocalyptic wasteland.
More specifically, Sawyer loved that the critical path of Fallout 1 “is very open.” If you really want to and know where to go, you can waltz right to the late game areas and skip a big ol’ chunk of the story. Funnily enough, Sawyer also says that one of Fallout’s co-creators, Tim Cain, told him that’s down to a bug, but hey, everyone enjoys it enough so it’s a feature now.
And a good thing it is, as it made quite the impression on Sawyer.
“I loved how open it was, and so, with New Vegas, I was like, ‘I want to get that feeling back where we have difficulty gates,’ so we took some of the level scaling out,” he says. “It’s a much more compressed level scaling range. That’s why if you go to Quarry Junction, a Death Claw will just chop your head off. It’s to teach the player, ‘hey, this is not actually Fallout 3. Things work a little differently. You’re going to get your ass handed to you if you’re not careful.'”
Watch On
To bring things to their most basic terms, enemies in Fallout 3 will increase in level and use better equipment to match your level. Return to an earlier locale in the late game and it’ll be a nastier place than you remember.
Fallout: New Vegas enemies can certainly get meaner themselves, but only to a point. As such, you don’t have to worry about Goodsprings turning into an endgame area if you return at a much later point. It does mean, though, that some of Fallout: New Vegas’s areas will punch you in the face if you’re not equipped. Think of it as a suggestion that you probably shouldn’t be here until you level up. Once you do, though, you’ll be able to steamroll foes in a way that isn’t typically doable in Fallout 3.
Sawyer goes on to say that this approach to game design meant Obsidian could offer the player the chance to follow Fallout: New Vegas’s story, as in Fallout, by skipping parts – albeit with the added challenge of surviving nastier areas.
“What that meant is that we could make the story – you can find Benny immediately,” he says. “Like, you can go from Goodsprings straight to Benny. And that’s the Water Chip. The design of that is you follow an information trail. I’m looking for this guy, I go here, he’s not here but he says go here, go here, go here. But at any time, you can shortcut that. You can go through Scorpion Gulch and you can get to Novak and talk to Manny and then go to Boulder City. Or you can go straight to The Tops if you can figure out a way to get there. So, yeah, I was trying to embody that open spirit of Fallout 1.”
I’d say Sawyer and Obsidian’s approach to Fallout certainly landed, which is why New Vegas is so fondly remembered even today. It makes the future interesting, too, as Microsoft is reportedly kicking around plans to get Sawyer to head up another Fallout game to capitalize on the success of the TV show, especially as Bethesda won’t be getting to that for a long time thanks to The Elder Scrolls 6. According to one former Obsidian lead, there was another Sawyer-led Fallout RPG in the works that ultimately got kiboshed, so it might not be the first time such a project nearly came to fruition. Maybe this time such a thing will stick and see the light of day.
Microsoft lays off Bethesda vet behind Todd Howard’s “crazy” Fallout 4 idea, “too many Skyrim weapons to count,” the Dwemer, and Mudcrabs – and he may leave games altogether.
Leave a Reply